Imbak para sa Nobyembre, 2012

CBCP disowns Arguelles

Posted in Gulo ng buhay with tags , , , , , on Nobyembre 29, 2012 by Blue Dela Kanluran

Two days ago I wrote an inflammatory comeback to wordpress about Lipa Archbishop Ramon Arguelles for telling people to vote for political candidates who were “true christians” and kick out candidates who wnet “against” the teachings of the church. An example of a religious leader attempting to control freedom to vote towards a religious agenda by using his influence and guilt tripping anyone who takes him seriously.

Unfortunately a lot of people take the words of an Archbishop seriously. Fortunately smarter heads prevailed (although it really doesn’t take much to be smarter than this guy). Senator and lawmakers (probably sensing the threat to their own seats of power) rebuked him for his statement and denied that there was any such thing as a Catholic block vote, most prominent of these was Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago. Most of them reminding him of the constitutional provision of separation of church and state as I have stated previously.

Arguelles remained adamant saying that the responsibility of remaining separate was the states alone. Stating the example that the only thing that the constitution provides is that the state cannot impose any test of religion to those seeking office. Which is true, if we were talking about the American Constitution. Section 6 of the Philippine Constitution (and anybody correct me if I’m wrong here) merely says “The separation of Church and State shall be inviolable.” That’s it.

And smarter heads seem to still remain within the CBCP as CBCP president and Cebu Archbishop Jose Palma (a man I’m not particularly fond of) effectively disowned Arguelles saying “it’s up to the people to make their own decisions” which is how it’s supposed to be.

The only thing I have with this statement is that he followed it up, in attempt to salvage some of Arguelles’ dignity, by laying the blame on the reporter “The paper misinterpreted the statement of one of our bishops in CBCP… there is a misunderstanding on the part of the reporter.”

Oh yeah, when in doubt blame the media. Nobody misinterpreted anything. We all saw and heard what he said. He was stupid and he said something even more stupid, end of story.

Advertisements

Write or (maybe) die

Posted in Gulo ng buhay with tags , , , , , , on Nobyembre 28, 2012 by Blue Dela Kanluran

Wait, what? I’m supposed to start now? With nothing to go on? Not even a clue or a hint? That’s not fair! If I don’t get anything I’m just going to be spouting bull and non-sense. I thought this thing was supposed to help me? and what the hell is up with the timer? If I wasn’t paying attention a full five minutes would have passed by and I wouldn’t even notice. how does this damn thing work anyway? Am I supposed to just keep typing? and then what? I don’t even think I’ll get punished, whatever that means. How can I be punished through my computer anyway? Now my eye is starting to itch, my fingers are staring to cramp from the frantic typing and I still don’t know the punishment thing. Is this like Deathnote? Where I’ll die if I don’t hit whatever number of words I’m supposed to hit in…11 minutes and 22 seconds? That’s hardly fair. For one thing I know the name of the app is write or die but I didn’t think the punishment would actually result in my death. And for another there was nothing in the rules that said I was going to somehow die if I don’t complete this challenge. I still don’t get how this is supposed to help me write though, I’m just panicking away at a keyboard hoping I don’t die from clicking on this stupid thing. Nine minutes to go. Now what do I do? I’ve run out of things to think about. I don’t care if I’m going to die or not I AM NOT going to talk about the weather, or its humidity, or the ominous gathering of clouds signalling what might be a gentle drizzle over my area in a few hours that will no doubt be a nuisance to commuters everywhere for about twenty to thirty minutes and then disappear like nothing happened. A tricycle is driving past the house. For those who don’t know its basically a motorcycle with a roofed side car. It’s a staple in Philippine transport and one of the most annoying. But then again I would rather have readily available public transport than what they have to settle for in the US where you absolutely need a car because everywhere else outside a radius of thirty meters is too far a walk. I got a lot on here so far and I think I’m about to hit five hundred words with…five minutes to go! What the hell! How am I supposed to manage that? I think I even wasted a full five just trying to figure what to do at the start of this thing. Four minutes now. I can’t seem to think straight. My fingers are starting to noodle into pretzels and twists just to keep typing. I can see the veins on my knuckles starting to pop just a little bit. Man that’s gonna hurt when I reach seventy. Three minutes! Holy shit just five words to five hundred. And I just passed it! Whew! for a couple of seconds there I actually thought I wasn’t going to make it. So what about this punishment? Now that I know that I passed I can’t wait to see this punishment that won’t be inflicted upon me hahaha! Bring it on non-physical executioner of this app. 1.5 minutes to go and I can finally relax. This was kinda fun actually, though a little non-sensical. I mean I still have no idea what to write about except maybe about a possible rim reaper for this app, or maybe a black ops strike team. thirty seconds now. What’s going to happen? 10, 9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1…

Getting Back on the Wagon

Posted in Gulo ng buhay with tags , , , , , on Nobyembre 26, 2012 by Blue Dela Kanluran

I haven’t written anything in the last three months and I didn’t even notice. My time has been stocked with nothing but reading books and cases; activities of the frat; quality time with my girlfriend; and just trying to keep up with the daily news. I haven’t even thought of exercising and have the growing gut to prove it.

So, this is an attempt to try and get back on the writing wagon and hopefully display some of whatever talent I had squandered by neglecting to hone it for so long, and I can’t think of a better way to get back to what I love doing the most than by systematically bashing a stupid move, statement, or policy by a status quo institution like the government or the church (whichever commits one first) and the big winner is *ding* *ding* no other than the backward moaning of self-righteous prelates out to revert whatever social advances mankind has achieved back to the middle ages.

Was that too harsh? Ok, maybe not the middle ages but definitely colonial Spain. Don’t believe me. Then let’s discuss a recent little thing that has propelled modern society into a system of better governance and acceptance for the general populace of the world but an otherwise nasty thorn for established religion more specifically the Catholic Church, the separation of church and state.

The separation of church and state is a vague concept to many and very few really understand what it means, even those few have a hard time trying to explain it to those who don’t. The idea was first introduced at the birth of the United States of America during the signing of the Declaration of Independence by a faction of founding fathers most notably Thomas Jefferson. Solidified in the provision that stated no religious test be required for the holding of office.

The separation of church and state came about as a practical divergence from the way of government of the Empire of Great Britain because the founding fathers saw how a system wherein a religion integrated into government could easily corrupt. Pretty easy to understand if you consider that the Catholic government system is basically authoritarian in nature.

The writers of the Malolos Constitution realized this as well when they decided to use the same policy when we liberated ourselves from Spain (another country with considerable theocratic influence). So what does this all mean? So many questions. Does it mean the church has absolutely no say in government policy? Will public officials be forced to leave their faith at the door? etc.

No and no. The church, like all parties in a democracy has a say in the government process. Also we cannot expect people to simply discard what they consider as their values when making decisions concerning government. So where does the separation actually take place? Where is the line drawn?

Many people bemoan the constant nagging of the Catholic Church concerning the RH bill and the supposed moral issues it conflicts with. However (and I can’t believe I’m actually saying this), what they’re doing does not violate the separation of church and state. Yes they have made a very strong oppository stance to a proposed bill. They have that right. Yes they have campaigned and protested against it, also their right. They’ve even spread a lot of misconceptions about the bill and a lot of misinformation about the science around it. No matter how amoral, under-handed and dirty as it may sound it is also their right to do so and does not violate the separation. In such cases it is up to each of us to sift through all the information and (based on the science) identify which is true and which is false.

We cannot fault politicians who make decisions based on their values. We can only assume that they are only doing what they think is right.

The church has (rather unknowingly) toed the line between acceptable behavior given their complicated relationship with government and policy making, that is until now. In a rather nasty turn of events the Catholic Bishops Council of the Philippines (CBCP) actually told people who to vote for.

“If there is a candidate who does not follow Church teachings, we should reject this candidate. We must use the Catholic vote and show them what the real Catholic is. There are fake Catholics here, they are the ones ruling in our country,”

This is the most bare-faced, hair-brained piece of filth I have seen in a long time. Archbishop Ramon Arguelles’ brains must consist of complete horse shit still warm from the beasts ass crack! The only reason I can think of for him to say something so inebriated is that idiocy was bred straight into his DNA. He is basically saying that anyone who even dare challenge the church should be kicked out of office and replaced with those who would cow-tow to their every word.

And if any of you were wondering, yes this is a violation of separation of church and state. The man (and the CBCP) are spitting on the seeds of democracy. Our government was founded on the idea that its leaders would be decided by the choice of the individual, not that individuals parish priest. No one and I mean  no one  has the right to order people who to vote for, especially not the church.